British Colonization in Africa

by

Sami Morgan

On June 6, 1885, countries met in Berlin met to discuss colonialism in Africa. This meeting was know as the West-Berlin Conference. Belgium, France, Great Britain, and Portugal along with others were there to discuss this topic with each other. This led to the entire colonialism of Africa. The Africans had no say in all of thish. This was why no countries save for Ethiopia and Liberia, were left to be independent.

Our Great Britain claimed part to a great number of territories in Africa. In West Africa, Britain was granted Nigeria, the Gold Coast, Sierra Leone, and the Gambia. "In areas without established rulers, the British generally chose Africans to serve as chiefs."(1) They made Africans chiefs of the countries, but the British put in their own laws for the Africans to live by. The Africans had to live under their own chiefs with their own people but by the British way. The British taxed the Africans so that the only way they could pay the tax was by working for the wages or selling their goods. The British will do a lot of good for the Africans. The infrastructure will improve greatly because of the British.

In East Africa, Britain was granted Uganda, Kenya, Zanzibar, British Somaliland, and Tanganyika. The British again used self-rule in East Africa. The British encouraged the Africans to plant cash crops. This made the East African countries very rich.(2) This was good for both the Africans and the British. Everyone became richer because of the cash crops in East Africa. If the British had not came in to East Africa, the wealth that came as a result would have never been introduced to the Africans. This was a good thing because all of this new business lead to more wealth for the British. In each of these countries, the Africans will probably want independence. They do not know that if they get their independence, they will lose the wealth that the British brought to them.

In Central and Southern Africa, Britain took over Southern Rhodesia, Northern Rhodesia, Nyasaland, Bechuanaland, Basutoland, South Africa, and Swaziland. In South Africa, diamonds were discovered. This made Britain stay there longer than they did in any other country. This was a very important find because the diamonds brought a lot of wealth to Britain. They gained partial control in South Africa because of the Dutch settlers that settled there to. Eventually the British took over the Cape Colony fully after a brief return to Dutch rule.(3) This was a big step for the Britsih because it gave them a strong hold on a part in South Africa. This will prove useful to the British when conflicts arise.

In North Africa, Britain took over Egypt and Sudan. Britain’s control over North Africa wasn’t as strong as it was over the countries in West, East, and South Africa. Despite this, Britain’s rule in North Africa was a very violent one. Even though it will be hard for the British to keep control of Northern Africa, the British will still be able to do some good in North Africa. Britain is a strong country and will not allow for the ruling to turn against them.

 

 

Footnotes

1.Middleton, John, ed. Colonialism in Africa. (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 2002), 156.

2.Middleton, 157.

3.Corona, Laurel. South Africa. (San Diego: Lucent Books, 2000), 37.

Images

1."Hotel Raffaello," n.d.,<http://www.hotelraffaello.it/>.(16 December 2003).

2."Exploring Africa," n.d.,<http://exploringafrica.matrix.msu.edu/curriculum/lm7/B/stu_7Bactivitytwo.html>.(16 December 2003).

3.Jezik, Angleski. "index," n.d.,<http://www2.arnes.si/~msmerk/>

Back to Assignment